The reading this week focused on
the effects of writing and print on rhetoric and how our society uses rhetoric.
Additionally if focused on the transformation from an oral based society to a
literature based society. According to Ong, literacy is different from orality
in that it involves writing and print. This difference he says is causing us to
become much more reliant upon literacy and text rather than orality. He even
attempted to discover more about orality by observing areas where literacy has
not become a large part of the culture yet and observing the differences
between the oral society and the literate one. He claimed writing is like
technology that we must learn and it requires a shift in society’s thinking
along with their practices. I find this even more fascinating since this piece
was written in 1982 and as such seems to give a bit of a societal timeline.
When Ong wrote this society was already text based, however this has only grown
since then. People in our society are externalizing their information at an
ever increasing rate and the medium for this is text and literacy. The phone in
ones pocket now has a vast aray of accessible information both personal and
public all in the form of literacy. If you ask someone in their twenties a
question that they don’t know the answer too, instead of consulting a scholar
on the issue they would consult the almighty Google in search for your answer.
Wolf in addition focuses on the
understanding of peoples interpretation of said literacy. Basically, Wolf tried
to understand the complexity and workings of reading and how society adopted
it. According to her, society changed rapidly with the occurrence of reading
and writing. The reading became less symbol based and more abstract. This
requires our brains to change and rewire themselves she says. I would wonder
however, is the transition over yet? Obviously our society if text based now,
and was fully oral based at one point in history. However, I wonder if our
society will one day be fully text based? Though it seems like it may be
already, there is still a large portion of society based upon orality such as
teaching and the legal system and such. Though these systems rely heavily upon
text to be affective, are we fully text based already? Is there more of a transition
to come? I would say that in my opinion, just seeing the extenede reliance upon
text from when Ong wrote his piece until now, there is still rome to change and
grow more text based.
No comments:
Post a Comment