“Kairos and the Rhetorical Situation” focuses on kairos and
how kairos is very much a key part of any rhetorical situation. Ancient Greeks
had multiple concepts of time, in such that they defined chronos as measurable
time and Kairos as a separate element of time. Rather than being a measurable
thing, karios was more of a theoretical notion that timing within rhetorical
situations is opportunistic and one must capitalize on this when employing
rhetoric. I feel that such a notion must have been extremely important in
ancient times since assembly and the ability to shed light on an issue may have
been extremely limited and in some cases impossible. However I would ask, does
todays ability to post to social media and the web give a greater occurrence of
this Kairos notion since any person or group can reach the masses easily
through social media? Does the fact that people can be bombarded with
advertisement and testimony on issues at the click of a button?
I say no.
Though it may seem that society can be reached easily due to our current
interconnectivity and constant state of feeding on web based information, this
is not the case. In fact, I would argue that this extreme state of
interconnectivity and web based information creates a lessened ability for Kairos
to be practiced. As I understand it, Kairos is supposed to relate to the timing
and opportunity used by a rhetoric appeal, and when society becomes used to the
social media bombardment and constant advertising it becomes even harder for
rhetorical appeal to do its job. This is because the constant presence of issues
and topics people are exposed to leads them to block out most things they don’t
find appeal in. Thus, appeal must be that much greater and focused on target
markets. This is why sites such as Facebook and other web based companies keep
track of people’s internet searches and interests, because then it becomes
easier to pin point your location within certain target markets and successfully
appeal to you.
In
continuing with the readings, Kairos can be understood in certain rhetorical
situations as questions. For example the book mentions the urgency of an issue
as part of Kairos. The book continues to say that the shelf life of a topic or
issue can be different and affect situations in many ways. I would then ask as I
did earlier, does media affect this? Is the shelf life of an issue extended or
shortened by media?
This one is
tough and I would say there are many different ways of looking at it however,
just as previously stated, the constant bombardment of topics and issues people
face makes it hard for an issue to seem important for a long time. Granted the
book states that there are certain issues which stand the test of time such as
abortion I would say that most shelf lives are shortened and the ones that are
extended such as abortion are due to the ever changing knowledge people have access
to on these issues. What do my readers think? I know this is a bit wordy, but I
was having trouble understanding the readings fully.
Crowley, Sharon, and Debra
Hawhee. Ancient Rhetorics for Contemporary Students. 5th ed. Boston: Pearson, 2012. Print.
No comments:
Post a Comment